The Jewish sin we never confess: Choosing indifference over love - opinion

The Jewish sin we never confess: Choosing indifference over love - opinion

SEPTEMBER 20, 2026 12:18The law is oddly specific. You go to the person you wronged and ask him to forgive you. He refuses. So you come back – this time with three of his friends, who stand there and watch while you ask again. If he refuses again, you return a third time.Then the law does something strange: it releases you. You may stop, Maimonides ruled, and the sin moves: the one who refuses forgiveness is now the sinner (Mishneh Torah, Laws of Repentance 2:9).Read that as procedure, not piety. You do not legislate three visits with witnesses for a feeling; you write law like that when someone is not permitted to walk away – and here that includes the person who was wronged.The season we have now entered is precise about what it cannot do. Yom Kippur atones for what stands between a person and God. For what stands between you and another person, it does nothing at all – not until you have gone to him and he has been appeased. Fasting will not fix it.The holiest day of the year is powerless in precisely the place where love lives. The vertical relationship can be settled in a day; the horizontal one requires you to knock on a door, or to open one.IN THE early morning before Yom Kippur, 2024, prayers for forgiveness are recited at the Western Wall and elsewhere in the Jewish world. (credit: Arie Leib Abrams/Flash90)And the knocking has a deadline: the obligation to appease falls on the eve of Yom Kippur. The rest of the year you can tell yourself there is time; on that day, there is none: 10 days of love; one day of atonement.I should say what I mean by love, because the word has been worn smooth. Not benevolence toward humanity – love of everyone is love of no one in particular, and it costs nothing. Not warmth, not compassion. Not identity, not pride, not heritage.What the tradition means is narrower and harder: an unearned, non-transferable, unbreakable claim that one specific, irreplaceable person has on you.An apology can be completed and finished with; that is what the release after three refusals is for. The bond underneath it cannot be.It rests on an axiom the tradition asserts rather than defends: a human being is made in the image of God, and therefore of infinite worth. Not the abstraction, but the man in front of you – which is what makes writing him off expensive.The season builds this into its grammar. The confession is plural: ashamnu, bagadnu – we have trespassed, we have betrayed. You say it in the plural even if you came alone.That grammar is a record of what actually held this people together: through centuries of exile, a bond neither calculation nor correctness could dissolve, and no empire could confiscate. Law, land, and belief were the vessels. The bond was the content.The sin of writing someone offWhich brings us to the sin nobody confesses.You know who it is. You are not estranged from him by accident. You had reasons, and they were good ones. He said something, or did something, that told you what he is.What the tradition forbids is not anger. Anger keeps him in the room. The opposite of anger is not peace; it is indifference, which puts him out of the room.What is forbidden is quieter – the moment he stopped being the address of any obligation, and the relief that came with it. It never gets confessed, because it does not look like a sin. It presents itself as clarity.The law saw it coming, which is why it refuses to forgive a sin of its own. It is less worried about the man who wronged you than about what you become while being right.This is not a call for unity. There are arguments in Jewish life that should not be dissolved, and pathologies that should not be accommodated for a family photograph. This love raises the temperature of the argument. It removes one thing only: the exit.And we too often choose the exit. It is possible to live a full Jewish life today – meaning, ethics, repair of the world – without one actual Jew making a claim on you.That removal happens in Israel under fire and calls itself principle; abroad, it happens in comfort and calls itself choice. A thin Jewish identity is not a weak commitment; it is a Judaism from which the face of the other has been erased.The law makes one exception: if the person you wronged was your teacher, Maimonides wrote, you go back a thousand times. There is no release, because there is no version of you without him.Ask what that exception protects, and you get the shape of the thing: a bond whose claim does not expire, in the place where a person was formed. A people is that, multiplied.On the Shabbat of these days we read Hosea: “I will heal their waywardness; I will love them freely” (14:5). Freely – not a verdict on their merit. That is what we will ask for on Yom Kippur. It is the exact love we spend the year declining to extend.You do not have to admit you were wrong, or agree, or find him tolerable.There are 10 days. God will take you back unearned. He is not the one you have to face.The writer is the author of the newly released A Jewish Tale of Love: On Defiance, Meaning, and the Fate of a People (Wicked Son, in partnership with the Z3 Institute for Jewish Priorities), which explores the history and present crisis of Jewish love.Follow us on Google

Original Source

Read the full article at Jpost →

KhanList aggregates and links to publicly available news content. We do not host full articles from third-party sources. Always verify important information with original sources.