Six Contradictions Behind Cognitive Debt in AI Assisted Development
The conversation about cognitive debt in AI-assisted development has been framed as a tradeoff: you can go fast, or you can understand your system, but not both. The proposed mitigations — pair programming, code reviews, requiring a human to understand each change — are braking mechanisms. They trade speed for comprehension. TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) says braking is a compromise, not a resolution. A resolved contradiction eliminates the conflict. You don't choose between speed...
Original Source
Read the full article at Dev →KhanList aggregates and links to publicly available news content. We do not host full articles from third-party sources. Always verify important information with original sources.