Trump’s diesel deal with Putin draws criticism from a frustrated Congress

The House speaker stood before Donald Trump during his first term at the White House and pointed a finger, declaring that with this President, “All roads lead to Putin.”Also read | Trump says Putin ‘would like to see a settlement’ in Ukraine warThe stark assessment years ago from Nancy Pelosi echoed anew after Mr. Trump’s surprise announcement last week that he struck a deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin to import tons of Russian diesel to the U.S. as a way to ease sky-high prices at the pumps for Americans ahead of the midterm elections.Mr. Trump’s diesel deal with Mr. Putin has been criticized by both Republicans and Democrats as fueling Russia’s war against Ukraine, violating existing U.S. laws and drawing the U.S. closer to Russia. It joins a growing list of instances where the President has sided with Mr. Putin, often at the expense of Ukraine — and America’s own standing.“The harm to the Ukrainians is real,” said William Taylor, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, now a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, in an interview on Monday (October 12, 2026).“And the cost to us, the United States, is high.”It’s not at all clear the Trump-Putin deal will deliver the supply boost the President is seeking to bring down prices. Energy experts have said the flow of Russian diesel is unlikely to lower prices in the U.S., which have escalated largely due to disruptions from the U.S. war against Iran. But the agreement underlines a message at home and abroad that Trump is an unreliable ally as Ukraine battles Russia.A bipartisan group of six senators urged Mr. Trump over the weekend to reverse course, saying the U.S. “should not provide Putin with a financial lifeline.” Mr. Trump, however, held fast to his deal with Mr. Putin and lashed out, blaming Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for America’s high diesel costs and asserting he should step aside — something Ukraine’s leader has no intention of doing.“Anything that could help our farmers, our ranchers, I like,” Mr. Trump said Monday (October 12) outside the White House.Asked about Republican criticism of the Russia deal, Mr. Trump said they “can’t really be serious.”Mr. Trump also insisted that an energy ceasefire is in place for Ukraine and Russia, despite Zelenskyy saying that Moscow continued to strike his country’s energy sites.An AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll published on October 1 found that Americans disapprove of Mr. Trump’s handling of the Iran war and blame him for higher prices.Congress swiftly approved legislation at the outset of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in spring of 2022 to ban the import of Russian energy products, which are widely viewed as providing the financial fuel for Putin’s military assault on Ukraine.The bill passed the House on an overwhelming 414-17 vote and the Senate without a single senator opposed. The law says the president can seek to lift the prohibition if an agreement had been reached to withdraw Russian troops from Ukraine and cease military activity. Such a proposal would need to be reviewed by Congress and to have been “accepted by the free and independent government of Ukraine.”“Trump is directly violating that law,” said Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, the bill’s chief sponsor, in a statement Monday (October 12).He said Mr. Trump “illegally rewards his pal Putin while once again blaming Zelensky for not capitulating to Putin.”More recently, Congress last month approved a sweeping Russian sanctions bill, named after the late GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham, that would slap tariffs on countries that continue importing Russian oil. Mr. Trump signed the bill into law.The bulk of the law’s provisions go into effect Oct. 18, the end of the administration’s 30-day review period. But such action now appears to be in question since Trump’s diesel deal with Putin will allow the flow of Russian energy.In a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Senate leaders from both parties last week said the most urgent priority for the U.S. must be to tackle the “shadow fleet” of tankers that Moscow is using to transport oil and bypass America’s sanctions.But that was before Mr. Trump announced his deal with Mr. Putin, which he said would unleash hundreds of tons of diesel.Treasury did not immediately respond Monday (October 12) to a request for comment.Republican Rep. Ashley Hinson, who faces a competitive race for the U.S. Senate against Democrat Josh Turek in Iowa, where $6 a gallon diesel prices have become an issue, said, “It makes me a little bit nervous anytime we’re talking about relieving a sanction on Russia.”Almost seven years ago this week, Ms. Pelosi stood before Mr. Trump and a roomful of U.S. officials during a heated White House meeting and leveled her accusation, suggesting the President’s policy favored Mr. Putin.The powerful House speaker led the first impeachment of Mr. Trump on corruption charges over his administration’s decision to withhold congressionally approved aid to Ukraine in 2019 as it faced Russian aggression at its border. Mr. Trump was later acquitted by the Senate.Since Mr. Trump’s return to the White House, he has seesawed between pressuring Mr. Zelenskyy to make concessions and showing frustration with Putin’s hardline stance on the war. Trump often complains that he thought his good relationship with his Russian counterpart would have made it easier to end the war.A year ago, Mr. Trump reversed his long-held position that Ukraine would have to give up land and suggested it could win back all the territory it has lost to Russia — only later to call on Kyiv and Moscow to “stop where they are” and end the war.In July, Mr. Trump praised Mr. Zelenskyy and Ukraine for their wartime resilience. But by September, Mr. Trump was expressing frustration about strikes on Russian energy infrastructure.Mr. Trump insisted Monday (October 12) the sides agreed to a ceasefire on the energy systems. “They agreed,” Mr. Trump said. “Because I said, ‘You agree.’”When pressed about the attacks by Russia, Mr. Trump said he’d have to take a look, “because there’s been violations on both sides.”