Travellers ordered to leave illegal site opposite UK’s top-secret nuclear weapons facility where 13 homes were built

TRAVELLERS have been ordered to leave an illegal site opposite Britain’s top-secret nuclear weapons facility after building 13 static homes. Dozens of families moved onto land opposite the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) spot in Berkshire, despite a planning injunction. The AWE in Aldermaston Berks where the UK’s nuclear weapons are researched and developed Credit: Doug Seeburg West Berkshire Council first ordered work to stop in November last year Credit: Supplied The sprawling site is Britain’s largest of three locations where nuclear warheads are manufactured. West Berkshire Council first ordered work to stop in November last year after a planning application was submitted. Sign up for The Sun newsletter Thank you! But building work continued, with heavy machinery used to clear the land and create multiple additional plots. A High Court injunction was then granted in December, banning further development and residential occupation. The Aldermaston traveller site has reportedly grown despite court order Credit: Supplied All residents on the site have been ordered to leave by October 5 Credit: Supplied Despite the order, the site continued to grow and by May this year there were at least 22 occupied pitches. Multiple planning applications were later submitted but were described as invalid and incomplete. Now High Court Judge Sylvia de Bertodano has rejected a bid by families to alter the injunction so they could remain while seeking planning permission. The families had argued their rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights should allow them to stay. Most read in The Sun They also raised the welfare of children living on the site and offered to leave if a future appeal against planning enforcement failed. But the judge said she could not allow the families to “ride roughshod” over the court’s previous order. She said allowing them to remain would render the planning injunctions “entirely toothless”. The judge said she was minded to order all families to leave by October 5. Heavy machinery used to clear the land and create multiple additional plots – taken November last year Credit: SWNS Google Maps view of the site where illegal construction work is being carried out – right next to Britain’s largest nuclear weapons facility Credit: SWNS One family will be exempt because they were living on their plot before the December injunction was served. AWE had warned that the presence of people on the site was affecting its Off-Site Emergency Plan. Judge de Bertodano said it was “clear” the situation could impact the safety of others. A witness also warned caravans could not provide the same protection as brick-built homes during a nuclear emergency. Locals had meanwhile been left “fearing for their safety” as the unauthorised development continued. More than 600 people signed a petition demanding an immediate halt to construction and land development. Residents claimed machinery was operating from 6am until almost midnight, causing noise, disruption and distress. They also claimed there had been attempts to illegally access the residential park’s water and electricity supplies. Locals claim they are ‘fearing for their safety’ as work on the unauthorised development continues Credit: Supplied General view of unauthorised works that have happened opposite AWE in November last year Credit: SWNS In a statement, residents said: “This situation has left our community feeling unsafe, anxious, and unprotected.” They insisted the petition was not aimed at travellers because of their identity, but was about “legal compliance, safety, and environmental protection”. West Berkshire Council said it understood how “distressing” the situation had been for nearby residents. A spokesperson said the authority had gathered evidence and reports to support urgent escalation of the case. The council also said planning enforcement was a civil process and it did not have powers to remove people from the land. It had requested support from Thames Valley Police and Ministry of Defence Police over site activity and public safety. Further rulings are expected by September 14, with the exact removal arrangements yet to be finalised. 2 comments2