Did Titanic overlook a major plot hole? From survivor lists to first class passengers, here's why Rose's "Rose Dawson" identity may not have stayed secret for long.On a flight recently, I needed a film for background noise, and I settled on James Cameron’s 1997 film Titanic (Casablanca or Crazy Rich Asians are my usual go-tos, but I was feeling rather nautical.)I’ve written about Titanic before, notably regarding my theory that large portions of the plot might plausibly have been lifted from reruns of The Love Boat. On this particular viewing, however, I noticed something striking. When Rose is on the deck of the Carpathia after having been pulled from the icy waters of the North Atlantic, she huddles on deck among third class survivors. Her fiancé, Cal, descends to the deck to look for her, but a steward stops him, saying that none of “his people” would be down there—these were all steerage (a contemporary colloquialism for third class). This is period-accurate. Class distinctions were much crisper in 1912, and stewards on transatlantic liners were particularly adept at recognizing this. Clothing, accents, vocabulary, all were markers of where someone fit into the stratified societies on both sides of the Atlantic. But that’s the beginning of the plot hole. Continue Reading Article After Our Video Recommended Fodor’s Video Rose Was Clearly Not a Third Class PassengerIf the crew could recognize on-sight that Cal wasn’t a third class passenger, wouldn’t they have easily done the same for Rose? Even bedraggled, frozen, and near-drowned, she would still have been pulled onboard in the evening gown and expensive men’s topcoat that she had been wearing when the Titanic went down. Even during the chaos of a rescue, it’s unlikely that an educated young woman in obviously expensive clothing would have found herself contained among third class passengers. There’s a wrinkle, however, in that logic that needs ironing out.Titanic’s passengers were lent clothing by graciously accommodating passengers in all classes onboard the rescue ship Carpathia. So, it’s plausible that Rose found herself in shabbier attire than she would have normally worn, but it’s also a stretch to believe that the clothes she was wearing weren’t noticed by anybody—not a steward who helped her find replacements, or anybody who might care for the dress she had on. She’s also shown to be still wearing Cal’s overcoat when the ship arrives in New York, still looking much more like a first class passenger who had just survived a disaster.Survivor Lists Were Well-PublicizedLeaving behind the clothing issue, there’s another inconsistency to deal with—administration. Record keeping for international travelers was relatively solid in 1912, and Carpathia’s pursers began the process of cataloging survivor lists almost immediately—not while the ship was steaming past the Statue of Liberty as depicted in the film. The lists were verified and checked, and transmitted via the ship’s wireless. Everybody onboard Titanic would have had to face a customs agent upon arrived in New York—first and second class passengers at White Star’s Pier 59 in Chelsea, third class at Ellis Island. Customs formalities were (mostly) waived for survivors onboard Carpathia—even for those in third class. (Six Chinese survivors were detained onboard Carpathia until they could depart for Cuba because the Chinese Exclusion Act prohibited their entry to the United States at the time.)In the chaos, it’s possible Rose could have slipped anonymously into the city with the new identity of Rose Dawson, but there are other reasons why it might not have stuck. If Rose had given her name as Rose Dawson, it would ostensibly have appeared on the lists of survivors which were published in the newspapers. The lists were divided, with separate sections for each class, and another for crewmembers, but it was also accepted that errors would be made. While it’s plausible that both Cal and Rose’s mother, Ruth, would have simply scanned the first class survivor list and stopped at the bottom of it out of snobbery, it’s more likely—particularly for Ruth—that they would have scoured the list for a similar name or a inadvertent inclusion in a wrong section of the list in a desperate grasp that Rose might have survived. Rose Was Well-Known to Many SurvivorsCal and Ruth also wouldn’t have been the only ones checking the passenger lists, and they weren’t the only ones onboard who knew Rose. In the scene where Jack Dawson joins Rose for dinner in first class, several other of the passengers at the table (a mix of real-life and fictional characters) also survived the sinking, including Margaret Brown; J. Bruce Ismay; Colonel Archibald Gracie; Noël Leslie, the Countess of Rothes; Sir Cosmo Duff-Gordon and his wife Lady Lucille Duff-Gordon.It’s likely a stretch that none of those people, nor any of the crew, nor any of the third class passengers who would have watched Rose and Jack dancing on a table in third class in patently first class evening wear would have failed to recognize Rose—even in the depths of immense post-traumatic stress—during the three and a half days it took Carpathia to reach New York. Rose’s Death Would Have Attracted Legal ScrutinyIt’s also established early on that the Hockley family filed an insurance claim for the loss of the diamond necklace, and they or Ruth would also have ostensibly filed a claim with White Star for damages for the loss of Rose’s life (particularly necessary for Ruth, who is depicted as being destitute without her daughter’s eventual marriage). The White Star Line vigorously fought these claims in court, and ultimately paid only a fraction of what was claimed, but it would have also subjected the survivor lists to even greater scrutiny by teams of attorneys for both parties, and a “Rose Dawson” would likely have attracted some attention. Rose Later Joined a Highly Visible ProfessionBut let’s say all of this falls through the cracks. Nobody’s paying too close attention; nobody notices a Rose Dawson on the survivor lists, accepting that she’s simply died on the Titanic. Until she becomes an actress, using the name Rose Dawson. This is where all the coincidence begins to ask viewers to suspend disbelief. It’s plausible that Rose could have anonymously faded away after the disaster—until her name and face start appearing on movie screens, giving Cal (who lived for another 17 years after the sinking) or anybody else who recognized her and her well-connected Philadelphia family enough pause to sit down and fire off a few inquiring letters, or for society and gossip column journalists enough crumbs to start investigating. So there we have it—a full review of a small-but-significant plot hole in Titanic. It’s not exactly a film-ruiner (I’ll definitely watch it on an airplane again), but it’s enough to give pause and reflection around some of the more magical thinking the plot requires to work.
Theres a Huge Plot Hole in ‘Titanic’ That No One Talks About
Full Article
Original Source
Read the full article at Fodors →KhanList aggregates and links to publicly available news content. We do not host full articles from third-party sources. Always verify important information with original sources.