The three tactics that could save your life if you're held at gunpoint, according to a former FBI agent

Few situations are more terrifying than having a gun pointed at you by someone who may be seconds away from pulling the trigger.In that moment, every word, movement and change in tone could influence what happens next.A former FBI agent, who spent 25 years as a special agent, has faced armed attackers himself and recently revealed three tactics that helped him escape alive.Speaking to LADbible, Joe Navarro said the first rule is to humanize yourself by telling the gunman that you have a family, loved ones and people who depend on you.The second is to speak in a low, soothing voice designed to calm the attacker rather than inflame the confrontation.Finally, Navarro advised slowly creating distance by carefully backing away whenever it is safe to do so.The former agent said he relied on those principles during two frightening encounters, one involving a knife and another involving a gun.In both cases, he focused on calming the situation and making himself appear like a human being rather than a faceless target. A former FBI agent, who spent 25 years as a special agent, has faced armed attackers himself and recently revealed three tactics that helped him escape aliveRecalling the terrifying encounters, the former agent said his priority was not overpowering the attackers or attempting a dramatic escape.Instead, he concentrated on lowering the tension and persuading the armed individual to see him as a person rather than simply a target.‘First of all, humanize it,’ he told LADbible. ‘Let them know that you have family, that you have loved ones, that you care about people.’The approach rests on the idea that revealing personal details could make it psychologically harder for an attacker to inflict harm.But Navarro said the words must also be delivered carefully, using a quiet voice intended to soothe rather than challenge the gunman.Navarro said the same principle of creating psychological comfort also played a crucial role during his FBI interrogations.Body language, he explained, can reveal whether a particular question has made someone anxious, frightened or uncomfortable, even when the individual says nothing incriminating.‘We have two domains: comfort and discomfort,’ Navarro said. ‘From an investigative standpoint, it was really about asking questions and then seeing what their reactions were.’ Joe Navarro said the first rule is to humanize yourself by telling the gunman that you have a family, loved ones and people who depend on you He recalled interviewing Rod Ramsay, whom he initially believed was merely a witness, about his experiences in Germany during the 1980s.The pair were chatting casually as Ramsay smoked a cigarette when Navarro unexpectedly asked whether he knew Clyde Lee Conrad, a US Army sergeant who had recently been arrested in Germany for espionage.‘All of a sudden, his cigarette just started shaking,’ Navarro said. ‘I mean, it shook like a polygraph needle.’Ramsay replied that he had ‘barely’ known Conrad, and Navarro resisted the urge to challenge him immediately.Instead, the agent steered the conversation toward other subjects and waited approximately 20 minutes before mentioning Conrad’s name for a second time.Once again, Ramsay’s cigarette began to shake.‘It was at that point that I realized that he had some sort of connection to Clyde Lee Conrad,’ Navarro said. ‘They had a nefarious relationship. In fact, they were both spying together.’Navarro said he used a similar technique while investigating a killing on the Colorado River Indian Reservation early in his career.Investigators knew the victim had been killed with an ice pick, an unusual weapon Navarro said only the killer would have known about.While questioning a suspect named Ricky, Navarro listed several potential murder weapons, including a machete, gun and hammer.The suspect remained composed until Navarro finally mentioned the ice pick.‘The minute I used the word “ice pick,” his eyelids came down and his chin came down,’ Navarro recalled. ‘It was like it was too much for him to hear.’Navarro then pressed the suspect, saying: ‘Ricky, buddy, come on.’‘One thing led to another, and he confessed,’ the former agent said.However, Navarro strongly cautioned that body language alone cannot establish whether someone is lying. It can only alert investigators to stress or discomfort that may warrant further questioning.‘Can we tell if people are lying? No,’ he said. ‘Please don’t let anybody tell you that they can detect deception through body language. They can’t.‘They can detect somebody that’s under stress, anxiety [or] discomfort, but not deception.’