The Supreme Court’s Originalists Are Cracking Up

This term's Supreme Court rulings have sparked significant debate about the integrity of originalism, the conservative doctrine claiming decisions are based on historical interpretations of the Constitution. While the conservative majority insists their rulings are strictly originalist, critics argue the decisions reveal a more partisan agenda. This skepticism is particularly notable given the Court's traditional claims to impartiality. The growing dissonance between rhetoric and practice raises questions about the future of judicial legitimacy and the Court's role in shaping national policy.