In the old days, it used to require actual work to show that the Supreme Court justices were driven by their personal beliefs instead of straightforwardly applying law, precedent, and procedure. You’d have to connect dots across multiple rulings and explain intricate legal doctrines. Even then, it might be too speculative to be truly persuasive.These days, I could probably convince my two-year-old son of the high court’s shenanigans just based on a single day’s rulings. Such a day arose on Tuesd...