The enterprise AI control that is still missing: code provenance
Enterprise AI governance keeps getting framed as a policy problem. Write acceptable-use rules. Turn on SSO. Add RBAC. Review risky PRs more carefully. That is all useful, but it still misses the one thing auditors, security teams, and incident responders actually need when AI-generated code reaches production: provenance. Not “did someone use AI.” Not “did the vendor log usage.” Provenance. When a critical bug lands in production, the question is not theoretical. Someone has to answer: What w...
Original Source
Read the full article at Dev →KhanList aggregates and links to publicly available news content. We do not host full articles from third-party sources. Always verify important information with original sources.