The celebs who behaved VERY badly this summer: Etiquette Queen LAURA WINDSOR names and shames this season's most uncivilised stars

It's not the BAFTAs, the Oscars or the Golden Globes... these are the Bad Manners Awards of the summer – the honours those in the public eye no doubt wish to avoid winning.Known as the Queen of Etiquette, I've been maintaining a watchful eye over celebrities this season and have noted numerous incidences of uncivilised behaviour.From Jennifer Lopez's humongous hat whilst in the Wimbledon crowd to Brooklyn Beckham's unamusing jokes at the expense of his loved ones, I can say with certainty that several A-listers have far from impressed during the summer months. I've been an expert on all things decorum and manners for years, and even advised Netflix on Regency-era social graces for Bridgerton – and have spotted countless stars breaching protocol or having a lapse in mannerly judgment.Weddings have, in particular, caused a grievous stir this year, with multiple missteps – including Danny Cipriani and AnnaLynne McCord 'crowdfunding' for their nuptials.So, pull up a chair, grab the popcorn and dim the lights... because without further ado, let the Bad Manners Awards begin: LACKS GOOD JUDGMENT: Danny Cipriani and AnnaLynne McCord's crowdfunded wedding AnnaLynne, 39, married Danny, 38, in the back garden of their home in Los Angeles after they asked friends and family to contribute $10,000 towards their nuptials via their wedding website The website, which was created through the Honeyfund platform, asked guests to donate anything from £75 ($100) to £450 ($600) to go towards the costs of their wedding dayAnnaLynne, 39, married Danny, 38, in the back garden of their home in Los Angeles after they asked friends and family to contribute $10,000 towards their nuptials via their wedding website. The website, which was created through the Honeyfund platform, asked guests to donate anything from £75 ($100) to £450 ($600) to go towards the costs of their wedding day. However, the move was branded 'tacky and distasteful' by insiders for 'two celebrities who boast a lavish lifestyle'. Danny is thought to have made around £4million during his rugby career, where he played for Wasps, Sale Sharks, Gloucester, Bath and Melbourne Rebels, as well as earning 16 England caps.AnnaLynne is believed to have amassed a similar fortune, after making a name for herself in roles on Nip/Tuck and 90210 in the Noughties. Her most recent part was in Days Of Our Lives, which was announced in 2023.The crowdfunding website was no doubt rather inelegant and demonstrates a lack of good judgment. A wedding is a personal and sacred celebration; it shouldn't become a fundraising campaign – especially when the couple can probably afford to pay for their own wedding. If they wanted to use their celebrity status to raise money, wouldn't it have been better to do something genuinely worthwhile and raise money for charity? A far more powerful statement.It raises questions about their values – are they truly celebrating love, or seeking attention and validation? There's a fine line between inviting others to share in your big day and expecting them to foot the bill that should rightly be your responsibility.Will this ultimately become a trend simply because a celebrity has embraced it? Or do they need to be reminded that true celebration comes from authenticity and generosity, not from expecting others to pay for your spotlight?SELFISH MOVE: Geri Halliwell wearing white to Mel C's weddingGeri Halliwell's decision to wear white, her signature colour, to Mel C's wedding to model Chris Dingwall raised eyebrows among fans (Geri pictured in her signature white at Ascot in June with husband Christian Horner)Sporty Spice Mel C, 52, married model Chris Dingwall in a 'perfect' Lake District wedding in the grounds of The Country House Cumbria last month.While Victoria Beckham was forced to miss Mel's big day as she supported FIFA ambassador husband David at the World Cup final in New York, her other Spice Girls bandmates Geri Halliwell, Emma Bunton and Mel B were all guests.But Geri's decision to wear white, her signature colour, raised eyebrows among fans, prompting newlywed Mel to address the drama during a recent interview. Speaking on Australian radio station Kiis1065, Mel gave her verdict on her guests' dress choices, admitting: 'I did have a little chat with Geri because it is her favourite colour. 'She wears it every day. But she had a beautiful floral dress on and it was white white... I did have a little giggle with her about that.' But wearing white to a bride's wedding is one of those unspoken rules that goes beyond fashion and personal preference – it's about respecting and honouring the person whose special day it is. When a guest chooses to wear white, it sends a clear message that they are putting their own interests above the bride's – a rather selfish move that steals attention away from the bride, and ultimately causes real hurt and tension on the day.This isn't just about clothes; it's about understanding the meaning of the rituals that make weddings sacred. The bride's white dress symbolises her unique role and moment in the spotlight. It reminds us that true elegance is about respect and consideration for others.DISREGARDING THE RULES: Molly Mae's parking tickets Molly Mae Hague has regularly been spotted tearing parking tickets off her £250,000 Mercedes G-Wagon The former Love Island star, 27, got slapped with a fine for the ninth time in a year as she parked in a no loading zone in Cheshire in MayMolly Mae Hague has regularly been spotted tearing parking tickets off her £250,000 Mercedes G-Wagon.The former Love Island star, 27, got slapped with a fine for the ninth time in a year as she parked in a no loading zone in Cheshire in May.Just the month before, Molly-Mae received a yellow ticket for parking in a loading bay outside her office and last year, she received two within 24 hours of each other.It is illegal to park in a loading zone unless you are actively loading or unloading goods and are following all posted rules. Private cars are often restricted from using loading bays and can incur a fine of £70 in Cheshire.Given her wealth and successful businesses, social media users often joke that the fines are simply a 'cost of doing business', while others question why she keeps parking in the same restricted spot. Yet it sounds to me as if she is someone who enjoys acting like she's above the law or entitled to special treatment because of her fame or wealth. This shows a disconnect from reality and responsibility. Getting nine fines in a year isn't a mistake; it's a pattern of disregard for the rules. Instead of ignoring or tearing up tickets, the real power lies in owning the consequences, and perhaps turning that energy into something positive – like donating what the fines cost to charity. That's emotional intelligence, rather than arrogance. Life isn't about avoiding consequences; it's about owning them.INCONSIDERATE DISRUPTION: Taylor Swift & Travis Kelce 'shut down' New York Taylor Swift faced heat over her recent wedding extravaganza amid the record temperatures and the furious New Yorkers caught up in the chaos NYPD officers were pulled from other duties on an already busy holiday weekend in order to manage the circus around the Taylor and Travis Kelce weddingTaylor Swift faced heat over her recent wedding extravaganza amid the record temperatures and the furious New Yorkers caught up in the chaos.NYPD officers were pulled from other duties on an already busy holiday weekend in order to manage the circus around the Taylor and Travis Kelce wedding.'It's the 250th anniversary of the United States of America,' one detective fumed at the time.'The NYPD should be watching out for terrorists. A wedding should be the last thing the NYPD should be worried about.''I understand to an extent that Taylor Swift may need a uniformed detail,' another official told the Daily Mail. 'But now, detectives and supervisors need to come off investigative assignments to stand around Madison Square Garden so she can get married.'The NYPD put out an order to commands throughout the city, alongside additional personnel.'Hundreds of cops are going to be reassigned from today until the wee hours of Saturday morning to cover her wedding at the garden,' an official said. 'No one is investigating anything.'The police presence generated backlash, with New York Representative Nicole Malliotakis writing on X, 'Taylor Swift & Travis Kelce should reimburse NYPD for the 130 officers needed per day to keep their multi-million dollar, thousand person wedding at MSG safe.'Our officers are already working overtime for 4th of July festivities & NYC taxpayers should NOT be on the hook.'Franko Agallio, 26, a local resident, said he resented the wedding going ahead at a time when New Yorkers are being told to turn down their AC units to prevent blackouts.'It is so stupid to turn lights off and save energy while she is having her wedding, knowing that is where all the energy will be going,' he said.The NYPD has not provided specific numbers or estimated costs. The Daily Mail previously reached out to the NYPD, mayor's office and Swift's spokesman for comment.Swift appeared to anticipate the backlash her nuptials would cause. The Cruel Summer songstress announced that she was donating $26million to charities including a New York food bank and a children's hospital.But here we are talking about something deeper than simply a big event -it's about respect for the community and being discreet. It is perhaps also about a deep-seated need for validation and attention. When a wedding shuts down an entire city, it stops being a celebration and becomes a disruption that affects thousands of people's lives.This level of inconvenience can seem entitled and inconsiderate.Celebrations can be grand without being disruptive and true class is shown not only by what you do, but how thoughtfully you consider the world around you.ETIQUETTE FAUX PAS: Jennifer Lopez's huge hat JLo prompted fury from tennis fans as she wore a huge sunhat to the men's singles final at the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet ClubWimbledon is known for clamping down on players who break its strict dress code – but celebrities in the stands can also spark backlash with their outfits.JLo prompted fury from tennis fans as she wore a huge sunhat to the men's singles final at the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club.The 57-year-old singer went to extreme levels to protect herself from the sun as Jannik Sinner beat Alexander Zverev to win the title for the second consecutive year.But fans branded Jennifer's hat 'inappropriate' and inconsiderate to the spectators sitting behind her. Taking to X, one angry fan penned: '@JLo this type of hat is inappropriate for such events! You should do your homework lady!'Another joked that it was so big it looked like she had folded up a cardboard box as they wrote: 'JLo looks like she has made her hat from an amazon box!'Other frustrated fans added: '@JLo just so you know, with that hat, guests that paid a lot of money to be right there , can't watch because you like to look good for Instagram.';'However JLo entered wearing a huge hat. They should have required her to remove It';'The hat is a bit much taking into consideration the people behind and next to you.'; 'JLo looks ridiculous in that hat. Pay attention to me as usual.';'Love the outfit just not the hat for this kind of event. First, it looks a bit like a crumpled paper bag. Maybe the Kentucky Derby because it's a hat show. But tennis matches are conservative, crisp, & clean so the attire should match the sport. You have great hair. Work it.'But others rushed to the star's defence as they explained she did remove it later in the game as she spent the day with Tom Hiddleston. Of course, she may have wanted to protect herself from the sun - or perhaps simply wanted to make a statement - but when you're sitting in a crowded stand, you have to think about othersThey wrote: 'She took the hat off. People leave this woman alone'; 'Big hat energy. JLo looks absolutely adorable!' Jennifer Lopez's giant hat at Wimbledon was, in my view, a bit of an etiquette faux pas. Of course, she may have wanted to protect herself from the sun – or perhaps simply wanted to make a fashion statement – but when you're sitting in a crowded stand, you have to think about others. A hat of that size can obstruct the view of the people sitting behind you. There's an old etiquette principle that applies here: you are free to dress as you wish but it shouldn't come at the expense of another person's enjoyment. And, of course, if you are a celebrity, one small breach of etiquette can very quickly become a headline – although perhaps that was exactly the outcome she wanted... ABANDONED COURTESY: Kim Kardashian's encounter with TV reporter at Monaco Grand Prix In June, Kim Kardashian was blasted by Formula 1 fans on social media after a toe-curling encounter with legendary TV reporter and former driver Martin Brundle at the Monaco Grand Prix Kim was approached by Brundle of British broadcaster Sky Sports, who has become famed within F1 for his pre-race walkabouts where he interviews celebrities on the grid before every raceIn June, Kim Kardashian was blasted by Formula 1 fans on social media after a toe-curling encounter with legendary TV reporter and former driver Martin Brundle at the Monaco Grand Prix.The reality TV star stunned on the grid on Sunday as she supported her new boyfriend Lewis Hamilton at the most glamorous race on the F1 calendar.Kim, who was joined in Monaco by her sister Khloe and watched the race unfold with fellow WAG Alexandra Leclerc, was standing with her entourage watching the pre-race ceremony unfold in the Mediterranean principality.She was approached by Brundle of British broadcaster Sky Sports, who has become famed within F1 for his pre-race walkabouts where he interviews celebrities on the grid before every race.Brundle walked up and down the packed Monaco grid in the moments before the race looking for celebrities and drivers to interview. He noticed Kim and Khloe standing by the track and approached them to try and get a word while on live TV.But both Kardashian sisters chose to rudely ignore Brundle, refusing to say a single word to him before they turned to their entourage in a bid to seemingly get him moved away.The embarrassing moment sparked fury among the F1 fans watching on at home. One commented: 'Kim Kardashian is not too good to talk to Martin Brundle. What a complete lack of class.'Another added: 'Didn't we just know Kim Kardashian would refuse to speak to Martin Brundle. 'Famous for absolutely nothing, can't carry an umbrella herself and she ignores Martin when talented sports persons and international actors embrace him. She has no place on our grid.'However, the issue here isn't that Kim Kardashian declined an interview. She was perfectly entitled to say no. The issue is that she failed to acknowledge the person who approached her. A simple 'No, thank you' would have been enough. Setting boundaries does not mean abandoning courtesy, and status does not remove the obligation to treat others with respect. You can decline an invitation while still acknowledging the person who has made the approach. That is the difference between confidence and entitlement. True elegance is not simply about what you choose to do, but how you choose to do it.IMMATURE BEHAVIOUR: Brooklyn Beckham's World Cup advert This summer, Brooklyn Beckham appeared to crack a 'cheap' joke about the rift with his parents in a World Cup advertThis summer, Brooklyn Beckham appeared to crack a 'cheap' joke about the rift with his parents in a World Cup advert.He promoted a food delivery company in the US just days after his mother and father popped up with Tom Cruise at the World Cup in Los Angeles. He smirks in a sponsored social media video and says: ‘You're probably wondering why I'm watching the FIFA World Cup 2026 from home... It's a long story,' before throwing some tickets on his coffee table.The food delivery firm he is promoting, DoorDash, shared it with the teasing caption: ‘We have a guess.’In Brooklyn's scathing six-page statement denouncing his parents in January, he hit out at 'Brand Beckham' and accused his family of valuing 'public promotion and endorsements above all else'.He added: 'All we want is peace, privacy and happiness for us and our future family.'To me, his behaviour comes across as both immature and misguided. Family disputes are deeply personal and, in my view, should be kept under wraps rather than turned into advertising material for public consumption. There is something rather uncomfortable about using a family quarrel as a marketing opportunity, particularly when the people involved are your own parents. It also raises questions about his emotional intelligence. No family disagreement should become a vehicle for commercial gain. His personal brand is now increasingly associated with emotional immaturity, and one that is happy to sell out his family for a bit of attention.