Neuroscience can't tell us the way to govern people's brains

Policy-makers are increasingly relying on neuroscience to inform laws and regulations, from determining the age of legal adulthood to addressing profound autism, but the science is still too nascent to reliably guide such decisions. This growing intersection raises significant ethical and practical concerns, as current neuroscience lacks the precision and understanding to ensure these policies are fair and effective. The implications are vast, touching on civil liberties, healthcare, and social justice, highlighting the urgent need for a careful, cautious approach until the science matures.