Nancy Mace calls for public execution of Lindsay Clancy: ‘It could be by firearm, it could be electric chair…’

Nancy Mace calls for public execution of Lindsay Clancy: ‘It could be by firearm, it could be electric chair…’

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) weighed in on the Lindsay Clancy case on Monday, September 15, saying the mother should be publicly executed. The Massachusetts mother faces three counts of murder in the killings of her children Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and Callan, 8 months.Nancy Clancy calls for public execution of Lindsay Clancy (repnancymace/Instagram, Greg Derr/Pool via REUTERS )“Her children are dead, she should be dead too,” Mace told TMZ.The South Carolina Republican later said, “She should get the death penalty. It should be public, it should be a public execution,” adding that Lindsay “deserves nothing less” than such a punishment.Also Read | Lindsay Clancy neck injury: What is ‘crushed thyroid’? Does it affect speech? Expert explains“It could be by firearm, it could be electric chair, I don’t really care,” she added, adding that it would serve as a “warning to women everywhere [that] you don’t kill your kids.”Mace doubled down on X, writing, “Lindsay Clancy doesn’t deserve to live.”Why a mistrial was declared in the Lindsay Clancy caseThe judge in Lindsay Clancy’s trial declared a mistrial after the jury could not reach a unanimous verdict and remained deadlocked after a week of deliberations. A mistrial means the trial ends without a verdict, so the defendant is neither convicted nor acquitted.Also Read | Lindsay Clancy: What happens after a mistrial? Can prosecutors ask for a new trial? Where the case stands nowA mistrial does not mean prosecutors have proven their case, or that the defendant is not guilty. The prosecution could now push forward with their criminal charges and restart the trial with a new jury or negotiate a plea agreement. Prosecutors could also dismiss the charges altogether.Jurors in Plymouth state court spent over 38 hours in deliberations over the charges against Lindsay. The 12-person jury was made up of nine women and three men, and was split 11 to one, per the notes given to the court, The Guardian reported.Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial after the jury returned without a verdict for the third time.

Original Source

Read the full article at Hindustantimes →

KhanList aggregates and links to publicly available news content. We do not host full articles from third-party sources. Always verify important information with original sources.