Israel's NYC consul, citing 'blood libel,' orders staff to cancel New York Times subscriptions

The New York Times has previously released reports fueling accusations of anti-Israel bias, particularly a May opinion piece alleging Israeli use of dogs to rape Palestinian detainees. Follow us on Google Ofir Akunis, Minister of Science arrives to a government conference at the Prime Minister's office in Jerusalem on September 27, 2023. (photo credit: CHAIM GOLDBEG/FLASH90)ByLEO FEIERBERG BETTERAUGUST 7, 2026 19:21Israeli Consul General in New York Ofir Akunis instructed his staff to cancel their New York Times subscriptions in response to what he described as a series of "false blood libels" published by the newspaper, according to a statement released on Friday.“Yet another blood libel against the State of Israel, based on ‘anonymous sources,’ has appeared in The New York Times," Akunis said in the statement."I remind you who the ‘sources’ were behind its previous blood libel – Hamas terrorists. I have therefore instructed that all subscriptions for employees of the Israeli Consulate to the newspaper, which consistently incites against the Jewish state, be canceled,” he added.Although it's unclear as to which article Akunis referred to, the Times published a piece Friday morning in which Gaza flotilla activists claimed to have been abused at the hands of Israeli authorities following their latest attempt to breach Israel's blockade of Gaza. In it, activists described being beaten, shot at with rubber bullets, and being verbally abused by Israeli soldiers and guards.Activists whose Gaza-bound aid flotilla was intercepted by Israeli forces chant while delivering a speech upon their return to the United States at JFK Airport in the Queens borough of New York City, US, May 24, 2026. (credit: REUTERS/RYAN MURPHY)New York Times has been in spotlight before over perceived anti-Israel biasThe article is the latest in a series of reports on Israel that have fueled accusations from critics that the newspaper displays an anti-Israel bias. Most notably, a May opinion piece by contributor Nick Kristof accused Israel of using dogs to rape Palestinian detainees, citing anonymous witnesses.Kristof's piece was published a day before the Civil Commission's nearly 300-page report on sexual violence during the October 7 massacres was due to be released, prompting accusations that the NYT had sought to blunt the report's impact."This is false," wrote the Times in a statement that same day, further claiming that it wasn't informed in advance of the report's completion or time of release. Israel condemned the piece, dubbing it a "blood libel." Soon after, the Times issued another statement of support for Kristof's work. In response to rumors that the NYT was readying to retract the piece, the newspaper defended Kristof as one of the world's "best on-the-ground reporters documenting and bearing witness to sexual abuse" in combat zones.Within days of its publication, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel was considering legal action against The New York Times over the accusations in the article. The newspaper said in response that any lawsuit aiming to "undermine independent reporting" would be "without merit."Follow us on Google