Investors are ignoring sky-high stock valuations and downplaying the potential for a stock market bubble

Skip to Content News Archives Economy Defence Energy Oil & Gas Renewables Electric Vehicles Mining Commodities Agriculture Real Estate Mortgages Mortgage Rates Finance Banking Insurance Fintech Cryptocurrency Defence Work Wealth Smart Money Wealth Management Investor Personal Finance Family Finance Retirement Taxes High Net Worth FP Comment Executive Women Puzzmo Newsletters Financial Times Business Essentials More Innovation Information Technology FP500 Podcasts Small Business Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Financial Post Store Obituaries Place a Notice Advertising Advertising With Us Advertising Solutions Postmedia Ad Manager Sponsorship Requests Classifieds Place a Classifieds ad Working Profile Settings My Subscriptions My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ News Economy Energy Mining Real Estate Finance Defence Work Wealth Investor FP Comment Executive Women Puzzmo Newsletters Financial Times Business Essentials This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.HomeInvestorInvestors are ignoring sky-high stock valuations and downplaying the potential for a stock market bubbleOpinion: With CAPE ratios near dot-com highs, FOMO has replaced the discipline of asking whether prices are fairLast updated 17 minutes ago When almost everyone is comfortable with the elephant in the room, the hardest task is simply acknowledging that it is still there. Photo by Donald Iain Smith/Getty ImagesThere was a time when investors cared about valuations. Analysts and commentators debated price-to-earnings ratios, price-to-book ratios and the sustainability of stock prices. Investors had a plan when it came to which stocks they bought, at what price and why, typically avoiding excessive valuations.THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLYSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLESSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLESCreate an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountThese days, something curious has happened. With the advent of passive investing and robo-advisers, the framework that once governed sound investing is almost forgotten. The mainstream consensus among many investors and strategists appears to be to downplay high valuations and the potential for a bubble. Current cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratios are about as high as at the peak of the dot-com bubble in the late 1990s, but few seem to care. The elephant is still in the room, but most investors seem to be ignoring it.This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.The bull market that began in the aftermath of the Great Financial Crisis has now lasted more than 17 years, interrupted only briefly by a global pandemic (in 2020) and the fastest relative rise in interest rates on record (in 2022). Ironically, it may be remembered as one of history’s most disliked bull markets. Investors and commentators spent years plagued by the recency bias of 2008, cautious about the next debt crisis, a wrong U.S. Federal Reserve move, the next recession or the next geopolitical shock. Yet, in the face of the Euro debt crisis, the Fed’s view that inflation was “transitory,” a technical recession in 2022 and two open wars that many thought would bring about the end of days, markets have continued higher.Canada's best source for investing news, analysis and insight.By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of Investor will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againPerhaps this is why today’s valuations no longer provoke the discussion or criticism they once did; value investing (and the framework that governs it) has gone so much out of favour that only the oldest and most fearful investors adhere to it, watching managers who are barely out of business school (if that) make more money in a year than they did in their lifetimes. Investors now laugh at those who remain married to fundamentals, having spent the past decade and a half warning about a crash that has yet to come.This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.What was once an extraordinary aberration bound to be brought back to earth now feels like the norm. But it shouldn’t. Many of the valuation measures that investors traditionally relied upon now sit at levels that would have generated widespread concern 25 years ago, and indeed did, leading to the dot-com bubble and crash. The difference today is not that prices have become more reasonable, it’s that we are collectively ignoring price and valuations.The past 17 years have seen numerous reasons to justify markets pushing higher; artificial intelligence is just the latest one. To be clear, AI is likely to transform the global economy and our way of life. Few technological advances have generated as much genuine excitement or attracted as much investment. But somewhere along the way, discussions about the technology began replacing discussions about price. A remarkable company is not automatically a remarkable investment, especially at lofty valuations. A revolutionary technology does not exempt investors from the mathematics (and reality) of valuation. The dot-com era taught precisely this lesson. The internet ultimately changed the world far more profoundly than most people imagined, yet many investors still lost fortunes by paying extraordinary prices for admittedly extraordinary businesses, but extraordinary businesses that were already priced to perfection.This advertisement has not loaded yet.This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.History has a way of repeating itself, although almost never in identical fashion. Today’s enthusiasm may ultimately prove justified. Corporate earnings have been strong (compared with the dot-com mania) and could continue growing. Productivity gains from AI appear real and could exceed expectations as the technology grows. Perhaps current valuations will look perfectly reasonable in hindsight. But investing has never been about certainty; it’s been about mathematical probability.Instead of investors asking whether an investment is fair value, investors are asking whether they can afford to miss out. Fear of overpaying has steadily been replaced with the fear of missing out (FOMO). The reason investors are more bullish now than ever, even at these valuations, is because being bullish is what has worked: In the face of pandemics, wars, recessions and inflation, everything bullish has worked. Therefore, investors are not working within a valuation framework, but a behavioural one.The longer markets rise, the easier it becomes to assume they should continue rising. Eventually, elevated valuations cease to look elevated because investors have forgotten what normal looked like in the first place. That, more than earnings multiples or market data, may be the real elephant in the room.This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.Markets do not ring a bell before sentiment changes. They never have. Expensive markets can become even more expensive, just as pessimism can linger long after bargains appear. Valuation has always been an imperfect timing tool. It remains, however, one of the most reliable measures investors possess. Perhaps this is why thoughtful investing feels harder today than at any point in recent memory. The old rules appear less certain and the new rules make money without a second thought. Traditional valuation metrics compete with technological optimism, passive investment flows and narratives that seem to justify almost any price.When almost everyone is comfortable with the elephant in the room, the hardest task is simply acknowledging that it is still there. But those who do so will be prepared for when that beast finally wakes up and disrupts the party.David MacNicol is president and portfolio manager at MacNicol & Associates Asset Management. With more than 40 years of capital markets experience, he oversees investment strategies focused on risk management, alternative investments and portfolio protection strategies for high-net-worth clients and institutions in North America.We apologize, but this video has failed to load.This advertisement has not loaded yet.Notice for the Postmedia NetworkThis website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Original Source

Read the full article at Financialpost →

KhanList aggregates and links to publicly available news content. We do not host full articles from third-party sources. Always verify important information with original sources.