In Mail-In Ballots Decision, the Supreme Court Ignored History

The Supreme Court's decision on mail-in ballots sidestepped historical legal precedents, notably from the Civil War era, which could have provided valuable guidance. By ignoring this history, the court potentially missed an opportunity to align its ruling with long-standing legal traditions. This move is significant as it sets a precedent that may impact future elections and the court's role in interpreting election laws, raising questions about the court's willingness to engage with historical context in its rulings. The decision underscores a broader trend of the court making rulings without fully considering historical legal frameworks.