How redefining one word strips the Endangered Species Act’s ability to protect vital habitat

The Trump administration is attempting to redefine a key term in the Endangered Species Act, which could undermine the law's effectiveness in protecting vital habitats for endangered species. This move would allow for the destruction of critical environments, even if it means prohibiting direct harm to the species themselves. This shift is alarming because it prioritizes economic interests over the ecological integrity necessary for species survival, highlighting a broader issue in environmental policy where political agendas threaten conservation efforts.