Hegseth’s Leadership Has Damaged the Pentagon

The defense secretary’s impeachment charges come after he cost his department years of experience and poisoned relationships with Congress. By , a senior fellow and the director of foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute. A man in a light grey suit salutes outside a building entrance beside a uniformed military honor guard holding rifles, with a sign reading "Department of War" mounted on the wall behind him. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stands for anthems at the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, on Oct. 15. Finn Gomez/Getty Images November 9, 2026, 4:32 PM On Monday, U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie introduced articles of impeachment against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, triggering a vote in the House of Representatives that could come as early as this week. Massie, a Republican who will leave Congress in January, accuses Hegseth of waging an “unlawful” war in Iran and abusing the office. Hegseth will be the first civilian leader of the U.S. military establishment to face impeachment in 150 years. The last, William Belknap, was President Ulysses S. Grant’s secretary of war—the title at the time for the civilian leader of the U.S. Army, before a unified Defense Department. The House voted unanimously to impeach him. Belknap resigned ahead of his Senate trial; he avoided conviction because of many senators’ discomfort with impeaching a private citizen. (Impeachments do not require the accused to be in office.) On Monday, U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie introduced articles of impeachment against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, triggering a vote in the House of Representatives that could come as early as this week. Massie, a Republican who will leave Congress in January, accuses Hegseth of waging an “unlawful” war in Iran and abusing the office. Hegseth will be the first civilian leader of the U.S. military establishment to face impeachment in 150 years. The last, William Belknap, was President Ulysses S. Grant’s secretary of war—the title at the time for the civilian leader of the U.S. Army, before a unified Defense Department. The House voted unanimously to impeach him. Belknap resigned ahead of his Senate trial; he avoided conviction because of many senators’ discomfort with impeaching a private citizen. (Impeachments do not require the accused to be in office.) Massie’s charge sheet includes eight counts, the most severe of which is that Hegseth “knowingly executed and implemented unlawful orders to initiate war against a foreign nation notwithstanding the absence of congressional authorization” and “demonstrated that he will remain a threat to the Constitution if allowed to remain in office.” Four of the counts of impeachment involve war powers, while the others concern civilian casualties, extrajudicial killings during boat strikes, suppressing free speech, and kidnapping a foreign leader. The indictment does not include some of Hegseth’s more egregious norm- and law-violating behavior: violating the Impoundment Control Act by refusing to release funds authorized and appropriated by Congress for aid to Ukraine, requiring uniformed military participation in partisan rallies, refusing briefings to congressional Democrats, denying press access to the Pentagon, firing without explanation more than two dozen senior officers confirmed by the Senate in their ranks and positions, appointing people forced out of military service for insubordination or political acts to senior civilian positions in the Defense Department, renaming the department without congressional authorization, and campaigning against sitting members of Congress. President Donald Trump continues to support Hegseth, praising him for “winning two wars.” And the defense secretary continues undaunted: On Nov. 5, he released a nearly six-minute video insisting that “this is not about me, but of course, the other side, in case you’ve noticed, they’re obsessed. A disgruntled, defeated congressman, along with all his Democrat allies, has also dropped sham articles of impeachment against yours truly, just like they tried against President Trump twice.” The defense secretary’s most important responsibility is managing Congress because under the U.S. Constitution, it is Congress that has the power to “raise and support Armies” and “provide and maintain a Navy.” Hegseth has poisoned those relationships. It is likely that his impeachment will be successful in the House on at least the count of attempting to penalize the speech of Sen. Mark Kelly, whom Hegseth groundlessly accused of sedition. (Hegseth has initiated proceedings to retroactively reduce Kelly’s military rank and retirement pay.) Rep. James Comer, the Republican chairman of the House oversight committee, sounds dubious about defending Hegseth rather than supportive, saying that “there are a lot of questions” about the defense secretary. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is a “hard yes” on impeachment. Tennessee Gov.-elect Marsha Blackburn appears unlikely to give Hegseth an exit with honor by appointing him to her vacant Senate seat. Trump will surely goad Hegseth on to fight the impeachment and behave outrageously—both as a distraction from the drubbing of the Republicans in the midterm elections and to indulge his entertainment approach to governance since it would be “great television.” Whether or not Hegseth is convicted, his actions have already cost the Defense Department years of combat-tested experience in the senior leaders who were forced out and have instilled a chilling effect on those who remain. Hegseth has eroded military readiness by poor planning for the Iran war, requiring extended deployments; robbed the force of funding by failing to gain congressional support for a war supplemental spending bill; continued munitions shortfalls because he structured the budget to pay for them in expectation of a third partisan reconciliation bill; damaged retention in the force, as 53 percent of service members now want to leave earlier because of politicization; and caused allies to question the legality of U.S. military operations. There will be a strong temptation among Hegseth’s adversaries to bring the military into the impeachment process by calling fired officers to testify as witnesses. This would be a mistake, both normatively and practically. As a normative matter, it damages civil-military relations to place the military in the position of judging its civilian masters. What a democracy should want in febrile political moments is for the military to remain politically inert. Practically, what some envision as a long table of uniformed officers with glittering medals bearing witness to policy depredations would actually be a parade of suits explaining that they have no idea why they were relieved or forced into retirement. The two fundamental tests of whether the U.S. model of civil-military relations is healthy are that the political leadership can fire any military officer and that the military will carry out the civilian leadership’s policies whether or not it agrees with the decisions. For all the destruction that Hegseth has visited upon the U.S. military, its professional adherence to subordination to civilian control remains strong. That is yet one more reason the military deserves much better civilian leadership than Trump, the senators who confirmed Hegseth as defense secretary, and Hegseth himself have provided. Politics Military United States Kori Schake is a senior fellow and the director of foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute. She is the author of The State and the Soldier: A History of Civil-Military Relations in the United States. X: @KoriSchake Read More A close-up shot of Rumsfeld, a man with gray hair and rimless glasses looking directly ahead with a serious expression, positioned just behind the blurred profile of another man in the foreground. Is Hegseth the New Rumsfeld? When the face of an unpopular war faces a wrathful Congress, “stuff happens.” U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth departs after a news conference at the Pentagon in Washington on March 19. Why Hegseth Should Go The defense secretary puts stunts over substance. The U.S. should send him on permanent leave. OTHER SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS Stories Readers Liked Go to slide 1 Go to slide 2 Go to slide 3 Go to slide 4 Go to slide 5 Go to slide 6 Go to slide 7 Go to slide 8 Go to slide 9 Go to slide 10 Three people rest on a sandy beach while a large, partially submerged and tilted ship sits out in the water in the background. The sky above is a hazy gray with cloud cover. A Taiwanese crowd protests while waving flags of the Republic of China. U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby, left, and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, right, stand during a press conference at NATO headquarters. Rutte is looking over at Colby, whose fingers are pressed together in a steeple gesture in front of him. Both men are wearing dark suits and ties, standing in front of a blue backdrop and U.S. and NATO flags. A camera rig and a red light are partially visible in the foreground, slightly obscuring the center of the frame. Xi (left) and Trump (right) are shown up close, with Xi looking at Trump. Putin and Xi are both seen in profile as Putin walks to the right and away from Xi, just a few feet of space between them. Xi, meanwhile, is also faced away from Putin, standing and looking down at his feet or the red carpet beneath them. Both men wear dark suits. A man wearing a dark suit jacket, light blue button-down shirt, and patterned red tie sits on a dark gray couch against a textured dark blue wall. He is looking off to the side with a mild smile, next to a teal pillow. The Twilight of the Francis Fukuyama Era By Jeremi Suri An illustration in red and blue tones depicting five silhouetted figures running forward through a dark corridor flanked by large, textured Russian lettering on the walls and floor. Light radiates from the far end of the tunnel behind them A statue of a seated, bearded man with a bare torso and draped cloth around his waist, holding a scroll in one hand, positioned in front of a row of large classical columns. Negotiators from the United States, Canada, and five European countries converse after finishing the draft of the North Atlantic Treaty in Washington on March 18, 1949. Trans-Atlanticism Isn’t Dead—It’s Being Renegotiated By Alexandra de Hoop Scheffer An aerial photo shows Doha in the booming petrostate of Qatar. U.S. Midterm Election Sen. Chuck Schumer is seen standing next to Rep. Hakeem Jeffries. Where Democrats Can Thwart Trump’s Foreign Policy From the Iran war to boat strikes to Ukraine, Democrats now have powerful leverage. Two people at night bend down along an outdoor ground memorial covered in small flags and flowers, flanked by rows of tall standing flags against a dark city background. People gather on a stage behind a podium labeled "Fighting for an Affordable America," with a woman clapping on the left, two men smiling toward each other in the center, including Jeffries, and two people embracing on the right in front of a blue backdrop. Supporters of Democratic U.S. Senate candidate, Texas state Rep. James Talarico, cheer as they watch midterm election returns during a party in Austin, Texas, on Nov. 3.