Has gentle parenting gone too far?

To be or not to be a gentle parent? That is the question. There is so much controversy these days about gentle parenting. What is it, and what is it not? Recent Canadian and international headlines provocatively told us about a toddler holding up an airplane because they refused to get into their seat and have their seatbelt fastened. Is this a case of gentle parenting gone awry or is it simply a child experiencing a genuine panic attack? Who knows, but it has certainly sparked the imagination and intense debate, including among parents. Read more: Is your child stressed, restless, hyperactive? They might be suffering from sensory processing issues At its core, true gentle parenting is a model that combines high emotional warmth with clear boundary setting. This approach is firmly grounded in the psychological framework of authoritative parenting. But what does this mean? Decades of robust developmental research demonstrate that children raised by parents who balance emotional warmth with clear, consistent boundaries thrive. They achieve significantly better outcomes in their emotional development, self-regulation and social and cognitive development. Balancing warmth and boundaries To truly understand this concept, we have to look at it in historical context. The view of parenting as an active verb is a relatively recent phenomenon. As Alison Gopnik brilliantly explores in her 2016 book,The Gardener and the Carpenter, child-rearing used to be seen simply as something you did. It just happened naturally, heavily supported by the broader community. Read more: It takes a village: How community can be a lifeline for improving child and family well-being However, around the 1970s, shifting workforce dynamics and societal changes transformed parenting into an active, high-pressure verb. Out came the expert-driven guidebooks, shifting many parents’ collective mindset from trusting our guts as responsive adults to an anxious belief that parenting must be executed just so. Biologically and historically, humans evolved in an ecosystem where the responsibility of raising a child was shared collectively, something known as mutual alloparenting and allomothering. Today, we have stripped that community away, leaving isolated caregivers to lose sleep, worrying around the clock. Parenting has become a high-pressure verb. (Kelly Sikkema/Unsplash) No boundaries alarm children What children need to thrive, according to decades of western developmental research, is a combination of high responsiveness and high structure. Children require predictable boundaries. When a four-year-old is put in charge — dictating when they go to sleep, whether they wear a seatbelt or constantly negotiating daily routines — it is actually deeply alarming to them. Predictable boundaries should be known and discussed, but they must never be negotiated when it comes to safety. Alongside these firm limits, emotional validation is hugely important. Children need their internal experiences acknowledged without adults minimizing their fears by saying “Don’t be scared” or shaming their anger by saying “Don’t behave that way.” The meaning of ‘co-regulation’ This balance is the foundation of co-regulation. A child’s nervous system is fundamentally immature, and it’s this nervous system that triggers the brain activation that drives behaviour. Therefore, young children require a calm adult to literally “lend them their calm,” anchoring their physiological system. One of the best pieces of parenting advice available is to check in with your own internal state before saying a single word to a dysregulated child. The empirical evidence backing this approach is substantial. In the 1960s, psychologist Diana Baumrind conducted foundational studies tracking the long-term outcomes of different parenting styles. She contrasted authoritarian parents — whom author Barbara Coloroso later vividly visualized as the rigid “brick wall” family — with permissive parents (whose style looks like saying: “Don’t put the cat in the microwave, OK, honey?”) right next to outright neglectful parenting. Time and again, the style that yields the best outcomes for both parents and children is the authoritative balance: firm limits paired with warm responsiveness and a deep respect for child autonomy. It’s important for parents to check in with with their own internal states before saying a word to a dysregulated child. (Pexels/Ron Lach) Emotion coaching Similarly, the excellent research of psychologist John Gottman produced 30 years ago emphasizes the power of emotion coaching. His work shows that when parents label and validate emotions, problem-solve through distress and simultaneously maintain firm, fair boundaries, it dramatically lowers children’s physiological stress and fosters long-term emotional competence. These empathetic interactions do not make children soft; instead, they forge the vital neural connections necessary for all future relationships and cognitive growth. Through co-regulation, children gradually internalize peaceful conflict resolution. They experience feeling awful and dysregulated, notice a calm adult stepping in to allow the emotion while containing the behaviour, and learn that they can safely return to equilibrium. This predictable sensitivity is how secure attachments are built, heavily relying on the healthy cycle of relational rupture followed by meaningful repair. Permissive parenting Today, some child behavioural experts believe what we are sometimes seeing is not true gentle parenting, but rather an anxious drift into “permissive parenting.” Some researchers connect behavioural problems at school and classroom challenges with permissive parenting approaches — for example, if children expect endless negotiation because the fundamental notion of adult authority has been abandoned. The misunderstanding that adult authority is inherently a problem demands a superhuman, impossible level of self-control from caregivers. Some public health experts have connected parents’ unrealistic expectations around parenting strategies, among other factors, with reports of intense parental burnout. ‘Good enough’ parents We desperately need to return to the wise counsel of psychoanalyst Donald Winnicott, who introduced the liberating concept of the “good enough parent.” The sensationalized cultural narrative that gentle parenting could be ruining or spoiling kids is fundamentally false; rather, it is the anxious misinterpretation of the concept that is causing harm. But, of course, a nuanced truth does not make for nearly as good a headline. Ultimately, an adult cannot ask a child to regulate themselves when the adult is completely dysregulated. If a child’s neurological system is in a state of meltdown, it’s important for parents to know they cannot talk the child out of it. Children need a parent’s steady, grounded nervous systems to find their equilibrium. By anchoring their own state and lending their calm, a parent offers the child the greatest gift a caregiver can provide. Because at the end of the day, beyond the expert manuals, the guidebooks and the online debates, every child deserves something novelist Toni Morrison wisely described: at least one adult whose eyes light up when they enter the room.