Google Pixel 11 Pro XL benchmarks leak — and Tensor G6 is 96% slower than Galaxy S26 Ultra

(Image credit: Evan Blass) Google is supposed to launch the new Pixel 11 series at a Made by Google event tomorrow evening. Unfortunately, the Pixel 11 Pro XL just popped up on Geekbench, revealing a phone that might not be able to keep up with the competition.With the caveat that Geekbench listings can be faked, this doesn't look good.We've seen one Geekbench listing for the Pixl 11 Pro XL, which reveals the new Tensor G6 chipset. The tested G6 has 7 cores with 16GB of RAM and appears to be running Android 17 out of the box.If you're unfamiliar with Geekbench, the test utilizes several tests to see how a CPU in a phone handles certain tasks. Single-core refers to how one core (or "mini-brain") handles a single task, like, say, photo editing. Multicore refers to how all the cores handle multitasking, such as running several open apps at once or gaming.Here's how the Pixel 11 Pro XL compares to the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the iPhone 17 Pro. Swipe to scroll horizontally Pixel 11 Pro XL Geekbench Scores compared Row 0 - Cell 0 Single-Core Score Multi-Core Score Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 2,112 5,196 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 2,995 8,562 Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 2,808 10,212 Here's another caveat, though: Geekbench changed to its 7.0 version recently, which updates the hardware that the test uses to compare. Across the board, scores are lower in version 7 compared to the ones in version 6. So there's not a ton of data yet.We ran Geekbench 7 just today on the iPhone 17 Pro Max and Galaxy S26 Ultra to get the above scores.Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.In single-core, the Pixel 11 Pro XL is weaker by 42% (iPhone) and 33% (Galaxy), but not so much worse that it isn't similar to previous years.However, multicore is where things get worrying. The Pixel is 65% slower than the iPhone 17 Pro 17 and 96% slower than the Galaxy S26 Ultra.I was able to find some version 7 Pixel 10 Pro XL scores and on average the Pixel 11 Pro XL actually seems weaker than last year's phone. I'm seeing multicore scores ranging from 4,500 to over 6,000. That said, all the single-core scores for the Pixel 10 are under 2,000 making the Pixel 11 slightly better.Notably, Pixel phones have tended to be slower than Apple and Samsung for years. However, Google is supposed to be catching up with new Tensor chips built on TSMC's more advanced 2nm process.That process is supposed to bring a performance and efficiency boost. Last year's Tensor G5 was built on the TSMC 3nm process, the same platform used by chips like the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and Apple's A19 Pro.Tom's Guide will be on hand at the Made by Google event tomorrow and once we have the phones in hand, we'll run the Pixel 11 Pro XL through our own battery of tests. Hopefully, this lone test proves to be the outlier and not the standard. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. More from Tom's GuideAfter 10 years of Pixels, why is Google still making phones?Made by Google event — how to watch and what to expectiPhone Ultra and iPhone 18 Pro pre-order date just tipped — here's when you can get yours Scott Younker is the West Coast Reporter at Tom’s Guide. He covers all the lastest tech news. He’s been involved in tech since 2011 at various outlets and is on an ongoing hunt to build the easiest to use home media system. When not writing about the latest devices, you are more than welcome to discuss board games or disc golf with him. He also handles all the Connections coverage on Tom's Guide and has been playing the addictive NYT game since it released.Something to share? Send secure tips on Signal: scyo1.55.