Erin Patterson appeal LIVE: Mushroom killer attempts to appeal triple murder charges

Updated October 30, 2026 — 10:01am,first published 9:25am10.01amCould Erin Patterson walk free?By Erin PearsonThe Court of Appeal will today hand down its decision on whether Erin Patterson’s criminal convictions should be overturned.They will also decide if her non-parole period of 33 years should be scrapped and if she should instead spend the rest of her natural life behind bars for the murders of her in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail’s sister, Heather Wilkinson, and the attempted murder of Heather’s husband Ian Wilkinson at a lunch in August 2023.Now-retired Supreme Court Justice Christopher Beale sentenced Patterson to life in prison, with a non-parole period of 33 years, on September 8 last year.At the time, Beale resisted calls from the prosecution to jail Patterson for life with no prospect of parole, telling the court her case was so infamous she was likely to remain in restricted conditions in custody.9.54amThe three potential outcomes facing Erin PattersonBy Erin PearsonThere are a few potential outcomes depending on how today may go.If the three justices dismiss Patterson’s appeal, she could remain incarcerated until she’s at least 80, unless her legal team take their case to the High Court.If her appeal is granted, Patterson could be ordered to face a retrial if the justices find she did suffer a miscarriage of justice during her earlier, 11-week trial in Morwell in 2025.If the prosecution’s appeal is granted, Patterson’s parole period could be quashed and she ordered to instead spend the rest of her natural life behind bars.9.53amFollow our live updatesBy Erin PearsonErin Patterson’s legal team is being led by barrister Richard Edney and are instructed by Doogue and George lawyers Bill Doogue and Ophelia Hollway.Office of Public Prosecutions director Brendan Kissane, KC, is leading the prosecution alongside junior barrister Jeremy McWilliams.Patterson is expected to appear via videolink from Dame Phyllis Frost Centre, the state’s main women’s prison.The appeal hearing has been moved next door to courtroom one in the Supreme Court where there is considerably more space for the public to attend.Court reporter Erin Pearson, who has covered the case for two years, will bring you updates as they happen.9.19amHow prosecutors are countering Erin Patterson’s bid for a retrialBy Erin PearsonBrendan Kissane, the director of public prosecutions, rejected the submission that there was a “fundamental irregularity” in Patterson’s trial as the jury briefly stayed in the same hotel as some prosecutors and police, which the defence argued “fatally undermined the integrity of the verdicts”.Kissane said the evidence showed there was “no social contact between any juror and any other person”.Brendan Kissane, KC, (right). Joe ArmaoHe said he believed trial judge Christopher Beale would have stopped the jury staying at the same hotel as some prosecutors and police in the Latrobe Valley had he known about it earlier. But he argued it was unintentional due to limited accommodation options and did not cause any fundamental irregularity as there was no evidence any prosecution figures spoke to jurors.The prosecution also argued the iNaturalist material was part of a collection of evidence that taken together demonstrated that the applicant had opportunity to deliberately source death cap mushrooms at a time close to the lunch, and on the prosecution case, did so.9.19am‘Unfairly grilled’: The witness box argument in Erin Patterson’s appealBy Erin PearsonErin Patterson’s defence team submitted seven reasons the mushroom murderer’s convictions should be overturned because:The jury was potentially contaminated by staying in the same hotel as prosecutors and police.Patterson was grilled unfairly by prosecutors during eight days in the witness box.The prosecution told the jury it did not have to prove a motive for the murders but then spent substantial time implying she was angry at the Patterson family over a child support dispute.Large tranches of evidence were wrongly shown to the jury, including cell tower links to two areas in rural Gippsland where deadly mushrooms grew.Photos and videos found on Patterson’s devices that could have backed her claims of being a mushroom forager were not shown to the jury.Evidence from Facebook “friends” and Facebook messages were not relevant, or their probative value was outweighed by unfair prejudice.Prosecutors used family text messages to imply a motive for Patterson arranging the lethal lunch when there was no motive established.9.18amWelcome to our live blogBy Erin PearsonAs three Court of Appeal justices prepare to hand down their decision on Erin Patterson’s triple murder conviction, this ruling could see her set for a retrial or facing life behind bars without parole.With her legal team pointing to seven grounds for appeal and prosecutors pushing for an increased sentence, today’s outcome will decide the next chapter in what is known across the country as the mushroom murders.My name is Erin Pearson, and I have covered this case for more than two years. Today, I will be in court providing constant updates as they happen.Follow along with us – the hearing is not expected to go on for too long.1 of 1