CI gates for AI-generated PRs need re-derivable evidence
When a CI gate flags an AI-generated PR, the important question is not only "what did it flag?" It is also: "Could someone else come back later and re-derive why this finding fired?" That is the reason I added evidence snapshots to Agent Gate v0.2.1. What Agent Gate is Agent Gate is a GitHub Action for AI-generated pull requests. It does not review code with an LLM. It checks deterministic merge evidence in CI: PR scope escapes GitHub Actions permission escalation AGENTS.md / ....
Original Source
Read the full article at Dev →KhanList aggregates and links to publicly available news content. We do not host full articles from third-party sources. Always verify important information with original sources.