Carney walks a political tightrope as U.S. trade talks approach deadline

Skip to Content News Archives Economy Energy Oil & Gas Renewables Electric Vehicles Mining Commodities Agriculture Real Estate Mortgages Mortgage Rates Finance Banking Insurance Fintech Cryptocurrency Work Wealth Smart Money Wealth Management Investor Personal Finance Family Finance Retirement Taxes High Net Worth FP Comment Executive Women Puzzmo Newsletters Financial Times Business Essentials More Innovation Information Technology FP500 Podcasts Small Business Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Financial Post Store Obituaries Place a Notice Advertising Advertising With Us Advertising Solutions Postmedia Ad Manager Sponsorship Requests Classifieds Place a Classifieds ad Working Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ News Economy Energy Mining Real Estate Finance Work Wealth Investor FP Comment Executive Women Puzzmo Newsletters Financial Times Business Essentials This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.HomePMN BusinessCarney Walks a Political Tightrope as US Trade Talks Approach DeadlineA year ago, after a meeting with Canada’s provincial leaders, Prime Minister Mark Carney made a pledge that he has since repeated many times.Author of the article:Brian Platt, Josh Wingrove and Nojoud Al Mallees You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.Bottles of American-made rum removed from a shelf at the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) Queen's Quay store in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, on Tuesday, March 4, 2025. The Trump administration may announce a pathway for tariff relief on Mexican and Canadian goods covered by North America's free trade agreement as soon as Wednesday. Photographer: Bloomberg/Bloomberg Photo by Bloomberg /Photographer: Bloomberg/Bloomber(Bloomberg) — A year ago, after a meeting with Canada’s provincial leaders, Prime Minister Mark Carney made a pledge that he has since repeated many times. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLYSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLESSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLESCreate an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an Account“Canada will not accept a bad deal,” he said about trade negotiations with President Donald Trump’s administration.That promise is being put to the test as never before. Canadian trade officials have spent days camped out in Washington as they try to reach a pact to avert a punishing array of new tariffs threatened by the White House. Trump and his officials have demanded Carney act on a lengthy list of trade irritants or the US will move forward on Aug. 19 with 50% duties on about $20 billion worth of Canadian products, including milk, plywood, hockey sticks and beer. Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againThe two sides are in intensive talks over a preliminary deal to stave off the new taxes, according to people familiar with the matter, speaking on condition they not be identified as the negotiations continue.The framework of a potential deal would see the US back away from the 50% tariffs and reduce certain Section 232 tariffs on Canada. The 232 levies are the ones Trump has put on foreign-made steel, aluminum, autos and lumber — all industries with integrated supply chains between the US and Canada.In exchange, Canada would remove some of its retaliatory measures and make other concessions, such as returning US booze to store shelves and widening access to its dairy market, the people said.One item under discussion would be lowering the US auto tariff, which is currently set for Canada and Mexico at 25% of the value of the non-US content, the people said. Trump’s previous deals with auto-exporting nations Japan and South Korea have cut the auto tariff to 15%. Roughly half of the value of a typical Canadian-made vehicle is from US components. So a 15% headline rate may mean an effective 7.5% tariff, depending on the model. To get such a deal, Canada would have to roll back its retaliatory tariffs on US-manufactured cars and trucks. The US and Canada are also discussing changing steel tariffs to exclude certain derivative products and potentially also lower the headline tariff rate, the people said. Canada has accepted that it can’t get all US tariffs removed. But it wants the Section 232 tariffs set at 10% or lower, and the US is resisting that, one of the people said. The situation remains fluid, and may produce an initial deal that wouldn’t settle all trade irritants but would open the door to further discussion, the people said. But any pact would need Trump’s blessing. The president had not yet been briefed on the talks as of Tuesday, a White House official said. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer is leading US efforts, with the involvement of others including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.A US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Trump administration is willing to discuss trade but is committed to the president’s policy of using tariffs and other measures to reshore manufacturing and reduce the trade deficit. The official declined to detail the ongoing talks.This advertisement has not loaded yet.This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.‘What’s the Alternative?’It’s far from clear whether Trump is willing to give significant ground on the Section 232 levies — or whether, in the longer run, his administration will even consider renewing the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement. That puts Carney in a bind: How far can he go in granting concessions if US tariffs are staying in place permanently?“This is going to come down to the US tariffs on steel, aluminum, and automobiles,” said Brian Clow, who played a major role for Canada in US trade negotiations under Carney’s predecessor, Justin Trudeau.“The 232s have to get close to zero, especially for automobile trade where the margins are so low,” he said. “If the US isn’t willing to significantly lower the 232 tariffs, the provinces won’t put alcohol back on shelves. If alcohol isn’t back on shelves, the US won’t finalize a deal.”Carney, 61, and his team have optimistically seen next week’s deadline as an opportunity to finally get the comprehensive tariff-reduction deal with Trump they’ve been seeking for more than a year. But the prime minister has limited room to maneuver. The liquor bans, imposed by provincial governments after Trump’s initial round of tariffs in early 2025, have done major harm to US exporters of wine, whiskey and other products. Canadian imports of American alcoholic beverages plunged 81% in a year, according to the White House. Carney can try to persuade provincial leaders on booze, but he can’t order them to. And each province has its own grievances with the US. For Ontario, Canada’s manufacturing heartland, a deal would have to include tariff relief on steel and autos to win over Premier Doug Ford. The premier’s office didn’t respond to a request for comment.In British Columbia, with its massive forestry industry, Premier David Eby’s priority is getting duties lowered on softwood lumber — though it appears lumber won’t be part of an initial deal, some of the people said. Eby’s office declined to comment. Recently, he said “there is not a chance in hell” US alcohol will go back on shelves in BC. “The idea of the president, that he can bully us into whatever he wishes, is incorrect.” And in Quebec, Premier Christine Fréchette will be looking for reduced tariffs on aluminum without giving away major concessions on dairy. A spokesperson for Fréchette said: “In the context of the ongoing trade war, the Premier continues to defend Quebec’s economic interests.”In other words, resolving the booze bans will necessitate a pact that’s palatable to policymakers across Canada of different political stripes. That’s yet another complication for Carney.“It underscores the difficulty of governing our country as a federation,” said Goldy Hyder, chief executive officer of the Business Council of Canada, which has been pushing Carney to get to a deal with Trump. “I think the prime minister has to carve out a place for doing what’s right for the country above all else.”A spokesperson for Dominic LeBlanc, Canada’s minister in charge of US trade, declined to comment. Many business executives don’t want Carney to grant concessions too easily. A KPMG survey of hundreds of business leaders found about 70% said the Canadian government should take a tough stance in negotiations, using any leverage it has available with the country’s most important trading relationship on the line. “If we are not tough, what’s the alternative? We’re going to concede and give everything that they’ve asked for without getting anything in return?” asked Joy Nott, a partner in KPMG’s trade and customs practice in Canada. “That would be seen as more negative.” In recent days, Canadian officials have warned Greer that they can’t accept a deal that forces concessions without getting any movement on Section 232 tariffs, according to people briefed on the negotiations. Such a move would be impossible given the Canadian public mood, they said. Polls show that, too. A recent Abacus Data poll found 69% of residents in Ontario and 72% in British Columbia want to keep the US alcohol restrictions in place.Another recent survey from the Angus Reid Institute found that 62% of Canadians want Carney to hit the US with retaliatory tariffs if Trump carries out his latest tariff threat. Only 19% want to take that option off the table and 7% want to offer up concessions.If Trump goes ahead with it, Carney “will have to do something,” said Eric Miller, founder of Rideau Potomac Strategy Group, a trade and economic consultancy. “The public is just angry. The public is kind of done.” —With assistance from Derek Decloet, Thomas Seal and Melissa Shin.Notice for the Postmedia NetworkThis website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.