Brent Broke $100 and the Majors Went Shopping in Venezuela

Skip to Content News Archives Economy Energy Oil & Gas Renewables Electric Vehicles Mining Commodities Agriculture Real Estate Mortgages Mortgage Rates Finance Banking Insurance Fintech Cryptocurrency Work Wealth Smart Money Wealth Management Investor Personal Finance Family Finance Retirement Taxes High Net Worth FP Comment Executive Women Puzzmo Newsletters Financial Times Business Essentials More Innovation Information Technology FP500 Podcasts Small Business Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Financial Post Store Obituaries Place a Notice Advertising Advertising With Us Advertising Solutions Postmedia Ad Manager Sponsorship Requests Classifieds Place a Classifieds ad Working Profile Settings My Subscriptions My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ News Economy Energy Mining Real Estate Finance Work Wealth Investor FP Comment Executive Women Puzzmo Newsletters Financial Times Business Essentials This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.HomeGlobeNewswireThis section is The content in this section is supplied by GlobeNewswire for the purposes of distributing press releases on behalf of its clients. Postmedia has not reviewed the content. by GlobeNewswire Brent Broke $100 and the Majors Went Shopping in VenezuelaAuthor of the article:What the supermajors did with the first triple-digit crude in over a yearTHIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLYSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLESSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLESCreate an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountNEW YORK, Sept. 11, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Oil Market Daily News Commentary – The intuitive response to crude above $100 is to drill. That is not what the largest oil companies in the world did over the past three weeks. With Brent closing at $101.21 on September 9, its highest since May 22, and West Texas Intermediate settling at $96.05, the supermajors spent the run-up trading assets rather than adding rigs: handing off operatorship of a multibillion-dollar liquefied natural gas project, swapping acreage, and, in three separate cases, buying deeper into a country most of them spent the last decade writing down. Companies mentioned in today’s commentary include: Chevron Corporation (NYSE: CVX), TotalEnergies SE (NYSE: TTE), Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE: XOM), Eni S.p.A. (NYSE: E), and BP p.l.c. (NYSE: BP).Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againThe price move is geopolitical, not geological. Brent gained 3.4% on September 9 to $101.21 and WTI 3.3% to $96.05 as fighting between the United States and Iran escalated in the Persian Gulf. Roughly a fifth of the world’s crude normally transits the Strait of Hormuz.Consumers are already paying for it. U.S. gasoline hit a Labor Day record of $4.15 a gallon, and GasBuddy’s head of petroleum analysis said diesel was expected to reach $6 a gallon for the first time on record within days.The banks moved their numbers, but not as far as the tape. Goldman Sachs raised its Brent and WTI forecasts by $5 to $85 and $80 for December 2026, and warned Brent could exceed $120 in 2027 if Gulf output stays four million barrels a day below prewar levels, a scenario it does not treat as its base case.Venezuela is the common thread. Three of the five companies below announced Venezuelan expansions inside two weeks, following the U.S. Treasury’s issuance of Venezuela General License 50C on August 27.Portfolio surgery beat capital expenditure. The single largest project decision of the period was an operatorship transfer rather than a new build, moving a long-delayed LNG development closer to a final investment decision without either party committing new drilling capital.Why the Majors Are Not Drilling Their Way Out of ThisA supply shock caused by a shipping chokepoint cannot be solved by a drill bit, at least not on any timeline that matters to the current price. The barrels at risk are already in production; what is at risk is their ability to reach a buyer. Adding rigs in West Texas does nothing about a tanker that cannot leave the Gulf, and the lag between a spud and first oil is measured in months against a conflict that has repriced the curve in days.That leaves the majors with a different question. If the risk premium is durable, where should the portfolio be sitting when it unwinds, and where should it be sitting if it does not? The U.S. Energy Information Administration does not expect Middle East production to return to near pre-conflict levels until early 2027, and has Brent averaging $87 across 2026. A forecast of that shape rewards barrels outside the Gulf, long-dated gas, and any resource that can be acquired rather than found.Venezuela fits all three descriptions, which is why the last fortnight looked the way it did.Five Companies, Three WeeksThe companies below are referenced solely as market and sector context and as examples of disclosed corporate activity during the period. None is presented as a recommendation, and none is a comparable of any other.This advertisement has not loaded yet.This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.Chevron Corporation (NYSE: CVX)Chevron announced agreements with Venezuela establishing updated terms for its joint ventures, including enhanced fiscal, commercial and legal provisions and additional acreage in the Orinoco Belt. The Petroindependencia joint venture, in which a Chevron subsidiary holds a 49% interest, was assigned rights to develop the adjacent Carabobo 1 and Carabobo-2-South-A areas. The joint ventures plan to invest more than $7 billion over five years and to more than double production to approximately 600,000 barrels a day compared with 2026, at total costs the company puts below $20 a barrel.Chairman and Chief Executive Mike Wirth framed it as a century-long position rather than an opportunistic one, saying the expanded footprint reflects confidence in the country’s resource potential and its ability to compete for investment within the portfolio for decades. The company’s three Venezuelan joint ventures have grown production 15% year to date. It follows an April agreement that raised Chevron’s working interest in Petroindependencia to 49% and assigned the Ayacucho 8 area.TotalEnergies SE (NYSE: TTE)TotalEnergies transferred operatorship of the Papua LNG project to Exxon Mobil and agreed to sell a 9.1% interest to its project partners, moving a development that has slipped repeatedly a step closer to a final investment decision expected later this year. The company also cut the project’s estimated cost to $14 billion. Handing the operating role to a partner on a project of that size is an unusual move for a company of TotalEnergies’ standing, and it is the clearest single illustration of the theme running through this period: capital discipline expressed through who carries the project rather than through whether it proceeds.Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE: XOM)Exxon Mobil is the counterparty on the other side of that transfer, taking operatorship of Papua LNG and with it responsibility for delivering a project into a gas market that has spent the year being reshaped by the same Gulf disruption affecting crude. For Exxon the appeal is straightforward. Operatorship of a large, late-stage LNG development is among the harder positions to acquire in the industry, and acquiring one at the point where a final investment decision is in sight rather than years away removes a considerable amount of the schedule risk that usually attaches to these assets.Eni S.p.A. (NYSE: E)Eni became operator of a Venezuelan oil field described in industry reporting as holding some 35 billion barrels in place, extending a pattern that has defined the Italian major for several years: taking operating positions in resource-rich jurisdictions that larger peers have historically found politically difficult. The scale of a resource of that size is not the same thing as recoverable reserves, and heavy oil of that type carries development costs, upgrading requirements and offtake constraints that a barrel count does not convey. What the move does establish is that the reopening of Venezuelan acreage is not a single-company phenomenon.BP p.l.c. (NYSE: BP)BP secured a Venezuelan offshore gas license in partnership with XRG, the international investment arm backed by Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, adding a third major to the list of Western companies taking new Venezuelan positions in the same window. The gas focus distinguishes it. Venezuela’s offshore gas has been discussed as an export opportunity for the better part of two decades without a great deal to show for it, and a partner with Gulf state backing changes the financing arithmetic on a project of that kind more than it changes the geology.What to WatchThree things. Whether the Hormuz disruption proves to be a quarter-long event or the multi-year one Goldman is willing to sketch as a risk case, because the difference decides whether these Venezuelan commitments were early or expensive. Whether any of the announced Venezuelan agreements survive the political cycle in both capitals, given that President Trump has publicly suggested the conflict will not resolve before the November midterms. And whether the current sanctions posture holds, since General License 50C is an authorization rather than a settlement.The wider point is worth holding onto. Triple-digit crude used to be a signal to spend on exploration. This cycle, the largest companies in the business responded by buying developed resource in a jurisdiction they can enter through negotiation rather than discovery, and by trading operatorship of a project nobody wanted to fund alone. Whether that reflects discipline or a lack of conviction in the price is the question the next two quarters will answer.CONTINUED… Read daily coverage of crude prices, OPEC policy, natural gas, refining margins and the politics that move the barrel at: https://oilmarketdaily.com/Article Sources:[1] CNBC, oil market reports, September 8 and 9, 2026 (Brent and WTI settlement prices, U.S.-Iran escalation, gasoline and diesel price commentary, Goldman Sachs forecast revisions).[2] Chevron Corporation, “Chevron Expands Position in Venezuela,” September 2026 (joint venture terms, Orinoco Belt acreage, investment and production plans, Mike Wirth commentary).[3] Energy Intelligence reporting on the transfer of Papua LNG operatorship from TotalEnergies to Exxon Mobil and the associated 9.1% interest sale.[4] Al Jazeera and U.S. Energy Information Administration market outlook reporting on Strait of Hormuz disruption, Middle East production recovery timing and 2026 Brent averages.[5] Public disclosures of the referenced companies.Nothing in this publication should be considered personalized financial advice. We are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular financial situation, and no communication from us should be deemed personalized financial advice. Please consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decision. This publication is neither an offer nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security. We hold no investment licenses and are neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice. The material in this release is intended to be strictly informational and is never to be construed or interpreted as research material. All readers are strongly urged to perform their own research and due diligence and to consult a licensed financial professional before considering any level of investing in stocks.THIS IS NOT A PAID ADVERTISEMENT. This article is editorial commentary published and distributed by Oil Market Daily, which is wholly owned and operated by Market Equities Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Ireland (“MEL”). MEL has not been paid, and is not being paid, any fee or other consideration by any company named in this article, or by any third party on behalf of any company named in this article, in connection with this article or with the mention of any company in it. No company named in this article commissioned, reviewed, approved or had any involvement in the preparation or distribution of this article, and no company named in this article had any opportunity to influence its content. No compensation of any kind has been received in exchange for any mention, inclusion, ordering or characterization of any company named herein.MEL and its owners, operators, directors and affiliates do not own any shares of Chevron Corporation, TotalEnergies SE, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Eni S.p.A. or BP p.l.c., and have no position, long or short, in the securities of any company named in this article. MEL reserves the right to buy and sell securities at any time in the ordinary course without further notice. There may be third parties who hold shares of the companies named in this article and who may liquidate their shares, which could have a negative effect on the price of those stocks.While all information is believed to be reliable, it is not guaranteed by us to be accurate. Individuals should assume that all information contained in this publication is not trustworthy unless verified by their own independent research. Because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, there will likely be differences between any predictions and actual results. Investors are cautioned that they may lose all or a portion of their investment when investing in stocks. This document is governed by the laws of Ireland.All companies named in this article are referenced solely as market and sector context and as examples of publicly disclosed corporate activity in the oil and gas sector during the period described. None is presented as a recommendation, and no company named is a peer, competitor or financial comparable of any other company named. The companies differ materially in scale, asset base, jurisdiction, capital structure and stage of development, and the results, transactions, guidance and share performance of any one of them are not indicative of the prospects of any other. No partnership, affiliation, sponsorship, or endorsement is implied.Cautionary Note Regarding Transactions and Forecasts: Several transactions described in this article are announced agreements that have not closed. They remain subject to regulatory approvals, antitrust clearance, shareholder or court approvals where applicable, and other customary closing conditions, and there is no assurance that any of them will close on the terms described, on the timeline described, or at all. Transaction values, production figures, reserve and resource figures, capital plans and expected benefits are as disclosed by the companies concerned and have not been independently verified by the publisher. Commodity price forecasts attributed to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, to investment banks or to other third parties are those parties’ projections as of the dates stated, are subject to revision, and are not forecasts of the publisher. Crude oil, natural gas and refined product prices are volatile and have moved sharply during the period described; prices and price levels cited are as of the dates stated and will have changed. Past performance does not guarantee future results.This release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements describe future expectations, plans, results, or strategies and are generally preceded by words such as “may”, “future”, “plan” or “planned”, “will” or “should”, “expected”, “anticipates”, “draft”, “eventually” or “projected”. You are cautioned that such statements are subject to a multitude of risks and uncertainties that could cause future circumstances, events, or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, including the risks that actual results may differ materially from those projected as a result of various factors, and other risks identified in a company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. You should consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements included herein, and not place undue reliance on such statements. The forward-looking statements in this release are made as of the date hereof and Oil Market Daily undertakes no obligation to update such statements.Notice for the Postmedia NetworkThis website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.