4 years after Dobbs, advocates clash over how far to take fight for later abortion access

Four years after the Dobbs decision upended Roe v. Wade, advocates are deeply divided on how to proceed in the fight for later abortion access. Kate Dineen's experience in Massachusetts highlights the harsh reality many face: restrictive laws even in states that once provided more liberal access. This case underscores the urgency of the debate, revealing the complexities and emotional toll on women who find themselves in medically complex situations. The clash among advocates reflects broader national tensions, as the legal landscape continues to shift and shape reproductive rights.