4 years after Dobbs, advocates clash over how far to take fight for later abortion access

Four years after the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the debate over abortion access has intensified, with advocates divided on strategies for preserving later-term abortions. The story of Kate Dineen highlights this struggle, as she was denied an abortion in Massachusetts despite being in the third trimester. This case underscores the ongoing legal and social battles over reproductive rights, reflecting the broader implications for women's health and autonomy in a post-Dobbs America. The clash over how to push the fight for later abortion access reveals deep-seated tensions and differing visions for the future of reproductive healthcare.